About Me

Name: Bryn T. Jones
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

After The Storm

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Wednesday, November 05, 2008 9:04:13 PM
American voters have decided, giving the election to Barak Obama in a stunning rebuke against President Bush and the Republicans.  It was not, however, so stunning as to indicate a mandate for Socialism.  Despite the worst conditions, John McCain hung on to 46% of the vote, higher than Bob Dole and George H. W. Bush in their respective losses. 

Yet from every defeat there exists the seed for future victory.  Republicans should realize that what was so disheartening about Bush was his big government conservitism (oxymoron that such a phrase is).  The government grew under Bush in ways it never should have.  And thus, he lost his base support. 

John McCain, while being an admirable man with stellar character, holds some of the liberal views that make him a half-choice away from a Democrat. 

Republicans need to remember their core values of family, hard work and individual charity.  Government is not the solution for our country, WE are (to paraphrase Ronald Reagan).  By clinging to the intrinsic value of a solid family, built in the traditional mold, by lauding hard work and achievement and promising to keep government out of the way, and by making it easier for charity work to flourish in our country, Republicans will offer a true alternative to the Democrats. 

In 2010 the Republicans should strive to do one thing: Present a clear front against government excess and growth.  By then, people will be struggling in the middle of this economic mess and will be prime to ask the question: if I have to face credit rejection and have to balance my budget month after month, why doesn't Washington?  Republicans can form a new Contract with America to cut programs that are not necessary and not only develop a balanced budget, but a plan to pay down the National Debt. 

Imagine how Republicans would stand to win in 2012 if they achieve 25% of such an ambitious plan.  Imagine having a projected budget surplus with dollars earmarked, not for spending programs, but for paying off the debt.  Our dollar would increase in strength and our economy would, again, be in a bull market. 

To do this, Republicans must not be afraid to be conservative.  They must not be intimidated by the Global Warming alarmists.  Most Americans, while buying into the idea of Global Warming, are skeptical and open to science that refutes the extremists.  Republicans also must start grass-roots education campaigns.  We need to have community classes in economics and free trade.  We need to have volunteers offer after-school programs to instruct our children in Capitalism and explain the dangers of Socialism.  Republican leaders should hold rallies and send out newsletters to educate this great nation in what Republicans represent. 

In short, Republicans must start tomorrow on re-marketing their brand.  Door-to-door, city-to-city, Republicans must inform folks so that as our economy falls flat under the burden of Socialist reforms, we can point out the danger in continuing down that path. 

Out of the ashes of 2008 true conservatism might yet be revived. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Slipping Landslide

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Monday, November 03, 2008 8:13:51 PM
It appears that Obama's landslide is slipping away on the evening before the election.  I have maintained that Obama's chances of victory are overrated for a long time.  I've clung to this belief even in the darkest hours.  I wondered if I was simply being stubborn, but...well, I am stubborn.  I don't give up. 

Fortunately, John McCain doesn't give up, either.  And now, heading into the election, his numbers are rising as we learn how Obama wants to bankrupt Coal and its ancillary industries and send our energy costs through the roof.  This from Mr. Redistribution.  This from Mr. Tax Cut For The Middle Class.  This from Mr. Energy Independence.  Oh, wait.  We will be independent from energy ...because we won't be able to afford it.  Now I get it. 

Onward John McCain!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Weekend Before

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Saturday, November 01, 2008 11:28:59 PM
Assuming the polls are accurate, the undecided vote should still cause Senator Obama some concern.  After all, if they haven't jumped on his merry wagon, are they really likely to join him?  I suppose his campaign figures these folks might side with a 'winner' and are doing everything they can to create that appearance.  But the fact that Obama is hitting Iowa, a state he supposedly has buttoned up, leads me to think he knows the polls are misleading. 

I saw 20/20 on Friday, in which Mr. Stossel commented that the Intrade has been more reliable than polls in predicting the winners of these contests.  Since it is determined by bets, that, too can be manipulated with a large enough group of bookies. 

From top to bottom, this campaign has had strange markings.  The handful of 'conservative' endorsers that use liberal talking points to justify their support seems awkward if not outright paid off.  The polls in Indiana and North Carolina most certainly look rigged considering these states have voted Republican by double-digits for the past 30--40 years.  Even Missouri and Virginia look a little odd in the toss-up category.  These states have been Republican mainstays. 

Florida and Ohio I can understand.  Those states have a mix.  But there, oddly enough, the numbers are not as in favor of Obama as those in the states where it doesn't make sense.  One might expect to see John McCain having to defend Ohio and Florida with passes to pick up a blue state. 

Yet, what we see is remarkable.  McCain is fighting in states that should be solid in his column, and Obama is returning to states he claimed were solid in his own.  Their movement should cast doubt on where they think their strength is. 

My guess is that the states that went for Bush in 2004, many of them by double-digits, will go for McCain.  These are folks who believe in America.  They like America the way it is, though they might be disillusioned with Bush's job performance.  I suspect that Obama and the other loonies have miscalculated the countries dislike for Bush and interpreted it as synonymous with their own hatred of Bush.  America doesn't hate Bush.  In fact, were he running against Obama, I would venture to say he'd beat the socialist from Chicago. 

And one more thing: We Americans don't frighten so easily.  Watch us show up and cast our ballots for McCain. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Two Kinds Of People In The World

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:10:12 PM
I believe there are basically two types that determine world view.  From these two basic paradigms we have conflicts such as Creation versus Evolution, Christianity versus atheism, Deism versus humanism and Free Market Capitalism versus Socialism.  The two, distinct castes are those who believe humans are born in a fallen, sinful state, given to basic urges of selfishness and evil, and those who hold to the notion that we are born innocent and pure, basically good.  Depending on which side one falls on, thus sprouts his or her world view. 

Those who believe humans are basically good point to the acts of kindness and the fact that we manage to get along enough to form civilized society and government.  We have a capacity for charity and empathy, compassion.  They believe that upon birth, everyone could be raised to be a paragon of good will and altruism.  The environment twists each in a different way, sometimes wiping out the inherent goodness with which one was born.  (note: such folks would not use 'environment' to mean one's ecological surroundings, but rather other already twisted humans who raise said child). 

This idea gains traction for its romantic appeal.  Everyone wants to believe that an infant cooing in a crib is 'innocent' and 'pure.'  Although, one look at that child chucking a hard toy at his parents or siblings will drive that idea to the bleachers.  Seeing a six-month-old screaming in anger at not getting his or her way will convince the most rose-eyed optimist that selfish desire exists without any prompting.  No, children never require teaching to do bad things.  It is good behavior we need to instill.  And re-instill, quite often. 

But this misguided belief in the inherent goodness of humanity persists among those who are naive or foolish.  They either are oblivious of the evidence against the hypothesis, or determined to ignore anything contrary to their precious belief. 

Out of the willful ignorance of this world view comes the idea that we evolved from ape-like creatures.  Despite never witnessing a creature change from one species or kind to another, nor any plant or cell or gene converting to another form, the humanists cling to this absurd notion that evolution not only happens, but that 'science' proves it.  The fact that science is the conclusion of careful observation is inconsequential to such folks.  They already ignore the evidence of human self-interest from birth.  They don't get hung up on details. 

Another accompanying product of the inherent goodness world view is ultimately Socialism.  It springs from the humanism/evolution idea that we are the masters of our fate.  We rose from ape-like creatures and evolved.  Such thinkers (if you want to be generous with the term) believe that we have failed to achieve a Socialist Utopia for lack of a collective enlightening.  Thus, they realize, this better form of living will just have to be forced on the mongrel masses in order to plunge us into the next plane of our existence. 

For those who reject the human inherent goodness and admit we are born with an evil bent, we recognize our wretched state.  We recognize the limits of our flesh and realize that we could not have simply evolved from nothing.  The good we do is a direct result of our Creator's grace.  We have not, after all, been purged of our Creator's goodness.  In an ironic sort of way, we ape our creator with our good deeds. 

Acknowledging our Creator leads us to seek a relationship with Him, which leads us to Christianity and a life devoted to service to a benevolent God.  Our service becomes acts of compassion and kindness which actually has provided true relief, if not utopia, to the world. 

This is not meant to be an exhaustive essay on a rather complex topic. I'll conclude by saying we have a war of world views--and we must stand firm with God.  He will ultimately win, regardless of what the humanists may accomplish in the short term. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S.A. Guilty of 'Nazism' Barak Says

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 9:55:41 AM
Read this segment of the new audio from 2001 in which Barak reveals his Socialist dogma.  In that Interview he also reveals that he sees what he calls elements of 'Nazism' going on in the United States. 
 
 
I find it endlessly amazing that these leftist loons continue to ascribe the Nazi mentality to Conservatives when Hitler came from the National Socialist Party.  After all, it is the leftists who want to silence free speech because it points out all their flaws.  It is the left that wants to bring unity by silencing all oposition. 
 
We need to say Never Again will we let our world be dominated by such dangerous people as Socialists like Barak Obama. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Showing Some Spine

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Monday, October 27, 2008 8:19:25 PM
Recently Michelle Bachman of MN apologized for her comments that she felt Barak Obama may have anti-American sentiments.  Granted, her words were twisted into a McCarthy-ite manner in which she called for Congressional Hearings of these nefarious folks.  Of course that wasn't true and she really should have laughed it off, shook her head and put out a statement that it is not she who goes on ad-homimem witch-hunts like the sort railed against Sarah Palin. 

Rather than back down from her statement, she should have clarified why she feels he may harbor anti-American ideals.  She had the nation's spotlight--she could have told everyone her concerns about him sitting and admiring the hate-monger Jeremiah Wright.  She might have mentioned his long history of identifying with and co-opting programs with socialist and anarchist radicals like William Ayres and Bernadine Dorn.  It was a great chance to point out that Barak Obama has long espoused the notion of "spreading the wealth around." 

The list of things she might have underscored are numerous.  She could have taken the shot that Chris Matthews intended and turned it around for her own bully pulpit to point out the simple fact that Barak Obama IS anti-American and we should all be concerned about it. 

She didn't need to reference the accusation of her wanting an investigation--that was just silly.  Ignore stupidity.  Underscore the real issue and she would have walked away ten feet taller with much greater political clout. 

For as long as recorded history unscrupulous men and women have sought to undermine those of us with firm convictions and righteous desires.  My Christian worldview dictates what is quite obvious: The world is on the villain's side.  But God is driving the virtuous.  Thus, we need not fear when they hurl their attacks over our wardrobe or how many children we have.  We shouldn't back down when they lob a Global Warming question our way.  We shouldn't tremble when asked if we think the world is six thousand years old or if dinosaurs co-existed with humans. 

No, we should stand on our faith, stand on principle, and remind these mongrels that their drive-by pot-shots don't frighten us.  We live in a nation that was founded on the principle of In God We Trust.  Despite their venom and vitriol, the majority of Americans still hold that foundation dear. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Zogby Poll Tightens on the Weekend

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Sunday, October 26, 2008 1:12:27 PM
I have been checking the Zogby poll rather than the compilation of the various polls, ludicrous with the legit.  Zogby seems fairly conservative and shows the battleground states far closer than the other polls.  This, it seems to me, is closer to the historical precedent.  A quick side note on that--If McCain carries Nevada (as the poll suggests), Missouri, Colorado, Ohio, North Carolina, Florida and picks up New Mexico and New Hampshire (both very possible), he wins. 

Anyway, back to the Zogby national tracking poll.  It strikes me as odd that the poll tightens progressively over the weekend, then expands during the week.  I wonder if the calls for the polls are done during the work day.  If so, the working folks who are more likely to vote Republican are around more on the weekend and affect the poll average. 

It's just a theory, but sounds plausible.  I think this race will probably tighten further this next week--though the MSM will likey find other polls that make it look wider.  I don't think I've ever witnessed such bias in the media.  I've seen bias, just not at such a fever pitch. 



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Hubris Factor

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Friday, October 24, 2008 1:06:43 PM
While the polls continue to shift, making the election as predictable as the stock market, Obama's syndicate is building a lavish stage on which to accept victory. 
 
This demonstration of inevitability doomed Hillary in the primaries.  I don't think Americans are all that taken with someone who has barely finished being a state senator, has not completed being a freshman U.S. senator and now presumes upon wildly fluctuating date that he will be accepting an electoral victory.  In fact, I think most Americans look down on those smug enough to figure they have our vote already. 
 
Quite frankly, the numbers are not all favorable for Obama.  Of the states that Zogby has as toss-ups, most hold leads for McCain.  One state, New Mexico, is in Obama's column, but shows a statistical dead heat.  History is on McCain's side.  Bush won his states in 2004 by wide margins, where Kerry won his by rather narrow margins.  The reason, Swift-boat issues aside, is that Kerry represented a leftie wanting to tax, spend and re-distribute wealth.  The game plan Obama proposes is identical. 
 
Also, Clinton never won the popular vote.  He prevailed because of Ross Perot.  In other words, the country still rejects leftist/socialist politicians. 
 
While many polls find Obama's lead growing to the double-digits, the more conservative polls, ones that have not fluctuated wildly, have the race in a dead heat.  Looking at Zogby's state-by-state polls, I think this election is close right now with a lot, 11%-20%, that refuse to say or are claiming to be undecided. 
 
Obama is trying what failed for him this past summer--Act like he has won already and that future will matterialize for him.  Let's not forget, in early September everyone was writing how badly Obama had bungled his campaign.  These stories are fickle. 
 
Obama may just be setting the stage for his own concession speech. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

October Surprise II

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:32:56 PM
Biden has provided the first "October Surprise" with his buckle-up if you vote for Obama warning.  He basically said what has been in the back of everyone's mind: Obama will embolden our enemies. 

In retaliation, Al-Qaida is getting into the mix: Their web sites are feigning support for McCain, claiming his policies will continue our economic turmoil--which furthers their nefarious plans.  Muwahahahahah!  Maybe the laugh wasn't really on the web site, but they may, indeed, have been twirling their mustaches between typing their posts. 

So, you've heard it here first (unless you read the news item I just read): Al-Qaida supports McCain!  And, to quote Biden, mark my words, listen, the main stream media is going to be talking about this A LOT tomorrow.  Why?  Because McCain is pretty much even in the national polls and closing in on the battleground states.  Zogby has Colorado down to a one point race, as it is in New Mexico.  Virginia is about a three point race right now. 

For the coming landslide, this isn't looking too good for the newbie. 

I said a long time ago that McCain would win this one.  Not because he is 'all that' but because he has the experience.  Obama is a fad that hasn't been properly vetted.  I could be wrong, but I don't think this Al-Qaida gambit will work at all.  Most will wonder--Why broadcast on web sites that you support McCain with two weeks to go to the election?  What possible impact would that have?  Hmmm.  Just thinking out loud here--I'd say it might sink McCain's chances, meaning Al-Qaida is as anxious for a President Obama as, say, Chris Matthews or Mike Allen (of Politico). 

Here's the link to the story http://www.kansascity.com/445/story/852066.html



 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Didn't Hear No Bell!

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:54:21 AM
In the Rocky movies, Mickey stood in Rocky's corner telling him to keep going when all hope seemed to be lost.  One of the lines was, "I didn't hear no bell!"  Of course, this determination in the face of insurmountable opposition was extremely frustrating to the other side.  From Apollo to Drago to Dixon, Rocky stood up while the commentators regaled him with insults and derission.  Interestingly, the crowd would innevitably be drawn to his determination and begin chanting his name as he proved that he could take it all and still remain standing. 
 
This election appears the same to me.  It is true that the media is always biased against the Republican candidate--it just seems more pointed this time.  It appears those in the media, the pundits or commentators, are doing a poor job of hiding their snears toward McCain, Palin, Joe the plumber, or anyone else who would have the audacity to question their candidate. 
 
So, while the challenger has youth, energy and the backing of the powerful media, McCain has a solid position of experience, world-understanding, and wisdom that could only be purified under fire.  McCain hasn't been the most conservative in the Republican Party, but he hasn't been a big spending, high taxing socialist, either. 
 
McCain can still win Virginia, North Carolina, Missouri, Florida, Colorado, Nevada, Ohio, and possibly New Mexico and New Hampshire.  If he takes those states, he'll win. 
 
Taking a line from the most recent Rocky movie, it ain't about how hard you hit, it's about how hard you can get hit, how much you can take and keep movin' forward.  Keep movin' John, we haven't heard no bell!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Intellectual Curiosity

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Monday, October 20, 2008 11:17:54 PM
I have heard it too often to ignore: Barak Obama will make a great President because of his intellectual curiosity.

I understand that he lacks experience (he was a state senator, then a U.S. Senator for a couple years before he started campaigning--jobs that do not require full time, 7 day a week effort).  I understand that he has accomplished nothing to recommend him to any executive office.  I understand that he has aligned himself with the corrupt political machine of Chicago and liberal radicals who seek to destroy our youth, one mind at a time.  I understand that he proposes vast amounts of spending that likely do not include the actual cost once the programs are implemented and that he hasn't begun to propose enough taxes to cover those costs, let alone our deficit (or pay down our debt). 

With all these strikes against him, what's left?  I guess Intellectual curiosity.  A cool head.  A confident demeanor. 

Well, a fool can be cool in the face of turmoil he doesn't understand.  An imbecile can stare down a charging bull with utter confidence if he doesn't realize he's not Superman.  But what on earth is intellectual curiosity? 

Does this mean Barak Obama is simply curious?  Like George who constantly caused trouble and messed things up?  Does it mean he's curious about intellectuals?  Or about intellect in general? 

Based on how he changes his mind as frequently as the weather in Minnesota, I'd say he's intellectually curious about what position may, in fact be the right one for any given moment.  He's against the war in Iraq and he's going to get us out yesterday.  Well, until he refines his position in light of the fact that he was wrong about the surge, which he still opposes for good measure.  He's opposed to drilling because there's no way more supply will ever affect the price in a supply and demand game.  Of course, he's open to it if it means he'll get more votes.  He's going to tax all those "super-rich" unless the economy is doing poorly (thus admitting that taxes would hurt the economy) but we haven't reached that point yet. 

Then we have John McCain.  He's not intellectually curious.  He's allegedly impulsive, eratic.  Although he's been rather consistent on what our economy needs: low taxes and less government.  He's been unwavering on when life begins and that it is sacred.  He's been solid on National Security and stands behind the Iraq war (though unpopular) and the surge, which proved him right.  He was an early voice against the dangers of unrestrained Fannie May and Freddie Mac. 

It seems to me that John McCain has something far greater than intellectual curiosity.  He has moral certainty. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Social Justice or Social-ism?

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Monday, October 20, 2008 11:04:24 PM
One of the phrases, along with "fair share" that gets me riled is the term Social Justice.  I've heard Christians declare that they won't vote on a single issue (meaning life) since the Democrats are the party of Social Justice.  But I wonder if anyone stops to think about the word 'justice.' 

Most would have to concede that justice refers to someone getting what's due them, whether good or bad.  If a criminal gets off a charge due to a small technicality, we all agree that it has been an IN-justice.  If a nut speeding like Mario Andretti gets ticketed, justice has been served.  If a child rapist gets early parole and ends up re-offending, injustice.  If a crooked politician gets caught and sent packing, justice was served. 

This is not a hard concept to grasp.  But, unfortunately, when Barak Obama starts talking fairness and social justice, all rational thought goes out the window. 

Is it really just to take hard-earned money from someone who started out working two, three jobs and has finally found success, and give any portion of that money to someone else who is at the beginning of their work journey?  Or worse, someone who hasn't started the journey at all. 

For social justice to make any sense, one has to believe that everyone who has money got it illicitly--like, for instance, a 30-year politician might.  Or, for that matter, a 4-year politician from Chicago.  In any event, the idea of social justice rests on a world view that sees that there are those who have money and the rest of us just don't have that chance.  And thus, because we are being deprived of that chance, the opportunity that is rightly due, our only hope is for government to take from those wealthy and give it to us. 

This communist paradigm is merely demagoguery in America.  We have incredible upward mobility.  Our society is constantly churning folks from the lower class to the middle class and from the middle class to the upper class.  We have the highest standard of living in the world for the greatest number of people.  Charitable giving from individuals dwarfs that from any other country in the civilized world.  Combine that with our government aid and we outspend everyone on the planet for humanitarian aid.  We are a wealthy and thriving country, not a land of oppressed proletariat. 

Social justice is that each should be allowed to keep what he or she earns.  Social justice would dictate that if someone doesn't work, he or she shouldn't eat.  Justice is cold. 

Thankfully, we don't follow true social justice, but mix it with social grace.  Grace is giving someone something he or she does not deserve.  And so, we have charities like the Red Cross and Salvation Army that pull folks off the street on cold nights, feed them and clothe them.  Our churches collect clothing and canned goods for those less fortunate.  Community groups provide disabled people a chance to work doing jobs that fit their mental or physical abilities. 

We are a great nation that should never listen to those who confuse justice with grace, or presume that the government should dispense either one. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The last two weeks

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Monday, October 20, 2008 10:06:44 AM
We are down to the final two weeks of one of the most important elections in recent memory.  Our economy is in shambles, thanks in no small part to the liberal policies that encouraged bad lending practices without oversight.  Our nation is a target for Islamic extremists and their part of the world controls the greatest oil supply.  Our small businesses are struggling because of the credit freeze and people are losing their jobs. 
 
We couldn't be facing more turmoil for a President to tackle. 
 
In every race for the Presidency the polls typically tighten as election day approaches.  This race will likely be no different.  The numbers have been inflated to favor Obama, that much is clear.  The folks at ACORN have done their best to introduce fraudulent ballots where they can.  But, as evidenced by Mr. Obama's desire to capture the center-right, this country is not going to vote for a radical Socialist like Barak Obama. 
 
While listening to Mike Gallagher this morning, I was hit by something he said--"we are in a fight."  We are battling something greater than a simple election.  The Bible tells us that we are fighting not with flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers in high places.  This is a spiritual battle.  Every Christ Follower should be on his and her knees (figuratively or literally) praying for this nation. 
 
Whether, by clear voting or by fraud, Barak Obama wins the Oval Office, Christians should continue to pray.  There will certainly be dark days ahead.  We need to be prepared for whatever is coming and we need to be faithful. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Colon Powel Bounce!

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Sunday, October 19, 2008 11:46:14 PM
It seems that mere hours after Colon Powell offered his "thoughtful" endorsement of Obama he has already induced a bounce for Obama, who happens to be slipping in the polls. 

More interesting was Mr. Powell's reasoning: That "even if" Obama was a Muslim, why should that matter?  Further, his opinion that John McCain's campaign has been smear happy. 

What little respect I had for Mr. Powell evaporated.  I had hoped he would take the high road and avoid endorsing either candidate.  The propaganda usage of his endorsement is so obvious I had hoped he'd opt out.  Instead, he sunk in for whatever reasons he truly has. 

The charge that John McCain's campaign has been disgraceful, however, is empty.  Mr. Obama's campaign, on the other hand, is guilty of fostering personal attacks of grand purportions against Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin.  We heard rumor after rumor, charge after charge against her and her family.  Ad hominem attacks keep coming to anyone brave enough to stand up and question Barak's silly policy positions (which, by the way, seem lifted from Karl Marx, or Groucho as the case may be).

Let's recap: Sarah Palin didn't give birth to her down syndrome kid--she's hiding her daughter's sleeping habits.  Sarah Palin guns down wolves from a helicopter. Sarah Palin used her office to fire a trooper illegally.  Sarah Palin has no experience (that, from Obama's camp is the most hilarious).  Sarah Palin is another Dan Quayle.  Sarah Palin is stupid because she believes in God (or she's just bitter, but we'll need to clarify that one).  Joe the Plumber isn't REALLY a plumber!  Joe doesn't make $250,000/year (so he really should support Obama).  Joe owes back taxes (which means he's not patriotic, according to Mr. Biden--or it puts him on par to run for Senator of Minnesota e.g. Al Franken). 

Did I miss any?  Probably.  I have a hard time keeping up with the mindless onslaught of attacks against anyone who generates excitement among the hard working folks called Americans. 

So, will Colon produce a bounce, as Time is already declaring, for Barak Obama?  I seriously doubt it.  Not without the pollster's help.  It appears that over the weekend the national average of all polls has Obama's lead shrinking to 5%.  With two weeks to go, and more scrutiny from voters, Obama's socialist plans will unravel any "landslide" he hoped to achieve. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sure sign it isn't over

Posted by Bryn T. Jones on Saturday, October 18, 2008 4:09:30 PM
I can recall, not too long ago, that op-ed after op-ed was declaring what Barak Obama failed to do in his campaign.  The op-eds and assorted articles were responding to how fast John McCain had taken in the polls.  It was early September and the conservative base was on fire.  People flocked to see Sarah Palin and John McCain and they put Barak Obama on defense something fierce.  Minnesota, of all places, was within a couple points' reach for McCain.  Michigan, too, had jumped into play along with Pensilvannia. 

Barak Obama and his willing accomplices in the MSM went on a long and nasty war against Sarah Palin (which leaves me wondering how they take such a high ground position against John McCain with regard to negative ads).  Week after week the world was treated to how terrible Sarah was and how McCain had shown his senility.  Oh, and that's right, he's old, leaving her a 'heartbeat away from the presidency.' 

None of this onslaught has changed Sarah's appeal.  Rather, the financial crisis induced a knee-jerk reaction against Republicans of every stripe.  And still, some polls only have McCain down by two to three percentage points. 

This leads me to my next item of interest:  I wonder how much the media, in its gameplan to help Obama, is cooking the data to favor their candidate.  It isn't like this would be new territory for polsters. 

Despite these insurmountable polls, we keep hearing story after story about how miserable McCain and Palin are.  Voters are 'souring' to McCain-Obama stays steady.  If the polls are acurate, why all the blatant headlines?  Why not write about whether McCain's strategy will make a comeback?  Why not write stories about why some still support him?  Those might be interesting news pieces in light of such an impending landslide. 

In short, if McCain is basically a dead candidate walking, why are the MSM and Obama's camp still kicking him?

I suspect they know that elections have been extremely closer in the past 30+ years than they like to remember.  They like to pretend that George W. Bush didn't win by the largest popular vote in history in 2004.  They like to forget that despite the polls, Hillary routed Obama in all the big states, particularly at the end. 

While it is entirely possible the polls are tapping into an angry populace that does appear to back Obama for now, things can change in two weeks.  Things can even change in the voting booth. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »