About Me

Name: Bryn T. Jones
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama's Inheritance

We are never too long from hearing how President Obama has inherited the economy he now must fix. What has become abundantly clear in record time is that Barak has spent his inheritance faster than the prodigal son. In fact, I dare say, he's become Bush II in regard to the economy that crashed around us all in 2008. When President Bush came forward with bailout after bailout for companies that were deemed "too big to fail" I opposed it. I saw a grim hand writing terrible omens against America at that time. After all, if the Conservatives are espousing Socialist solutions, then what are the Liberals going to do?

I am very grateful for President Bush and the work he did in office. I admire him as a man of integrity and humility and grace. While he certainly had any number of critics with much harsher words than Rush Limbaugh has ever leveled against Mr. Obama, he never answered them back. In his eight years, George Bush showed gave us the security that a government can provide--safety from our foes. He was, perhaps, singularly focused on that task, much to the detriment of our economy.

While Mr. Bush's critics state that the war in Iraq was the source of our economic doom, that just doesn't make sense. Sure, we spent money there, but it was ultimately securing our safety and financial ruin that would follow if we failed. Unlike, say, volcano eruption research that is allegedly so iminent a threat we needed it put into our Emergency Stimulus Package.

What W did not do enough of was to get tough on the domestic terrorists like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. He operated in a live and let live manner and a grace that allowed him to reach out to folks like Ted Kennedy who would rather cut off his hand. While he recognized the wolves howling at our shores, he chose to ignore the ones wearing sheep's clothing in our Congress. And this allowed them to sow the seeds of financial ruin around him.

To the extent that folks are trying to say that the poor folks living in tents are living in Bushville (after Hooverville of the 1930s), I say they are living in Reidville or Pelosiville and now Obamaville. The Marxist ideology and Humanist leanings of Barak Obama will lead to the destruction of the good character of America. I don't for a second wish for Obama to fail, as is the bait that liberals enjoy tossing out. I know for certain that he IS failing. His policies are tailor-fit to destroy the free market in favor of a corrupt government central system. His reversal on stem-cell research funding is merely the shot across the bow from a man who favored a facecious answer to when life begins over giving his true belief that life doesn't matter, it's merely a financial cost or burden on the environment, society, whatever. He has made good on every negative ad that John McCain put on the air.

During the campaign, the media skewered anyone who would claim Obama wished to do so many liberal things to our country. In fact, he did want to, and his past was a glaring reminder of the sort of things he'd want to do, if given the chance. After the election, many who should have known better let Mr. Hope and Change cloud them into thinking he might actually govern from the "center." What was true was that he was going to govern from the center of the Communist Manifesto.

It would be interesting if they do finally release Barak Obama's sealed and secret birth certificate. It may reveal his middle name is actually 'Castro."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Bait and Switch Pledge

President Obama recently made it his objective to cut the federal deficit in half. Interestingly, he failed to give notice of that intent prior to ballooning the deficit with his massive socialist overhaul of our economy in the name of doing something. But now, after saddling our budgets for years to come with increased spending that will not stimulate the economy, he vows to cut the deficit in half.

This position is akin to the high-priced retailers that hike their prices by 200% and then give a 75% "sale" for "this weekend only." President Obama may be in over his head with the job of Commander In Chief, and he may be an overall dummy when it comes to history or any other true intellectual persuit (logic, economics, basic math). But he is not stupid. He is an expert politician. Which is to say he is a smooth operator. He knows the words to say to get people thinking good things about him. For instance, when he declared about the terrorists that we "won't apologize for our way of life" and that "we will outlast you" and "we will defeat you." With what? Our limp wrists and jelly spines? Will we start reading them their rights (that they don't have) and start apologizing for having made some of them feel uncomfortable in order to save innocent American lives? How will we not apologize for our way of life? After we adopt the inefficient, costly, oppressive standard of living enjoyed by the Europeans where only the high ranking politicians get to keep, say, their Oval Office at tropic temperatures?

As our Mr. President was fond of saying, they're just words, just speaches. But he's smooth. He had many conservative commentators giving him props for saying what he did. My thought was, nice words, nice speech, now let's see with your actions, Mr. Obama. And so we have.

So, this promise of fiscal responsibility in light of his massive, rushed spending spree seems like another jolt to my senses. Will anyone believe this bafoon with such a bold-faced statement? Of course people will. There are many folks who bought, and continue to buy what Bill Clinton has said or is saying. Those same people believe George W. is a 'liar.' Mr. Bush should take that as a compliment in a backward sort of way.

Barak Obama, however, promises he'll accomplish this silly thing of cutting his extravigant debt that he made by 'scaling back' spending in Iraq, taxing the 'wealthiest' Americans (those poor saps), and, my favorite, streamlinging government. Now that he's enacted policy to make government a gorilla in the proverbial China shop, he's promised to attach a leash? And in an economy that cries out for increased opportunity, he's going to punish the achievers who would increase opportunity for the workers? And his plans for Iraq are like the newlywed couple who plans on having all sorts of extra money once the car payment is done, but forget that by that time they'll have car repairs, a child on the way, and possibly a change in insurance premiums and, ironically, tax increases. In other words, he's planning all other costs to remain as they are and simply reduce the spending in Iraq. Right. I'm sure it looks good on paper, with his crayon, perhaps, but it doesn't work in the real world. It doesn't work when one is trying to govern the most powerful country in the free world.

But, to his credit, since the bulk of the deficit is by his own design, he very well could make good on his promise. He could simply cut his own stimulus bill and say Mission Accomplished. Perhaps on an aircraft carrier, or something.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »